New York City, December 11, 2025
In New York City, a coalition of activists has proposed the state use eminent domain to acquire Central Hudson Gas & Electric, aiming for a public authority to reduce utility bills. A feasibility study backs the move, suggesting potential initial savings and enhanced climate preparedness. However, the initiative faces significant opposition from legislative bodies and corporate entities concerned about economic implications and service disruptions.
Activists Propose Public Takeover of Utility Company in New York
New York City, December 11, 2025 – A coalition of activists in New York has proposed that the state use eminent domain to acquire Central Hudson Gas & Electric, aiming to establish a public authority that would lower utility bills for residents. This initiative follows a feasibility study indicating that such a public takeover is viable and could lead to modest initial savings on gas and electric delivery rates, with potential for greater reductions in the future. The coalition also seeks to create a more responsive energy system and enhance preparedness for the climate crisis. However, this proposal faces significant opposition from both legislative bodies and corporate entities.
Feasibility Study and Potential Savings
The feasibility study conducted by the coalition suggests that a public takeover of Central Hudson Gas & Electric is not only feasible but could also result in immediate savings for consumers. While the initial reductions in gas and electric delivery rates may be modest, the long-term benefits include the possibility of more substantial decreases in utility costs. Additionally, the establishment of a public authority is expected to lead to a more responsive energy system, better equipped to address the challenges posed by the climate crisis.
Opposition to the Proposal
Despite the potential benefits outlined in the feasibility study, the proposal to take over Central Hudson Gas & Electric has encountered significant opposition. Legislative bodies have expressed concerns about the implications of such a move, particularly regarding the potential impact on the state’s economy and the legal complexities associated with eminent domain. Corporate entities, including the utility company itself, have also voiced opposition to the proposal, citing potential disruptions to service and the financial implications of a public takeover.
Background Context
The proposal by New York activists is part of a broader movement aimed at addressing the rising costs of utility bills and the challenges posed by climate change. Similar initiatives have been observed in other regions, where activists have called for public takeovers of utility companies to ensure more equitable and sustainable energy systems. For instance, in the United Kingdom, the “Don’t Pay UK” campaign urged collective non-payment of energy bills to protest rising costs and advocate for systemic change. Similarly, in Laos, the government announced plans to renegotiate electricity purchasing agreements with hydropower companies in response to public outcry over rising power bills. These movements reflect a growing global trend of communities seeking greater control over their energy resources to achieve affordability and sustainability.
FAQ
What is the proposal by New York activists?
The proposal involves using eminent domain to acquire Central Hudson Gas & Electric and establish a public authority aimed at lowering utility bills for residents.
What does the feasibility study suggest?
The study indicates that a public takeover is feasible and could lead to modest initial savings on gas and electric delivery rates, with potential for greater reductions in the future.
What are the goals of the coalition?
The coalition aims to create a more responsive energy system and enhance preparedness for the climate crisis.
What opposition does the proposal face?
The proposal faces opposition from legislative bodies and corporate entities, including the utility company itself, due to concerns about economic implications and legal complexities.
Are there similar movements elsewhere?
Yes, similar initiatives have been observed globally, such as the “Don’t Pay UK” campaign and the Lao government’s plans to renegotiate electricity agreements in response to public outcry over rising power bills.
Key Features of the Proposal
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Proposal | Use eminent domain to acquire Central Hudson Gas & Electric and establish a public authority to lower utility bills. |
| Feasibility Study | Indicates potential for modest initial savings on gas and electric delivery rates, with greater future reductions. |
| Coalition’s Goals | Create a more responsive energy system and enhance climate crisis preparedness. |
| Opposition | Faced from legislative bodies and corporate entities due to economic and legal concerns. |
| Global Context | Reflects a broader movement of communities seeking control over energy resources for affordability and sustainability. |
Now Happening on X
- @sarahana (December 11, 2025): Without public ownership, we won’t address energy affordability and won’t get our aging grid to the 21st century; the bill to replace Central Hudson Gas & Electric will start saving millions in Year 1. View on X
- @drogon_dracarys (December 10, 2025): A grass-roots coalition is trying to push New York State to use eminent domain to buy out Central Hudson Gas & Electric and replace it with a public authority. View on X
- @sarahana (December 10, 2025): Public ownership of our energy utility, Central Hudson, is the means to keep rates low, empower workers, and get a 21st century grid; a new study estimates it would save money immediately. View on X
- @hvpauthority (December 10, 2025): A new independent study estimates replacing Central Hudson with a publicly-owned utility will save $15.2 million in Year 1, and $210.5 million per year by Year 30. View on X
- @sandeepvaheesan (December 10, 2025): A feasibility study by NewGen finds that public power is the smart choice for the Hudson Valley; replacing shareholder-controlled Central Hudson with local public control would save ratepayers millions in year one and billions over time. View on X
- @EMPIREREPORTNY (December 10, 2025): STUDY: Government Takeover of Central Hudson Could Spike Customer Bills up to 36%. View on X
- @lostngone4ever (December 10, 2025): Coalitions clash over financial impact of public power in New York. View on X
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
Author: STAFF HERE NEW YORK WRITER
The NEW YORK STAFF WRITER represents the experienced team at HERENewYork.com, your go-to source for actionable local news and information in New York, the five boroughs, and beyond. Specializing in "news you can use," we cover essential topics like product reviews for personal and business needs, local business directories, politics, real estate trends, neighborhood insights, and state news affecting the area—with deep expertise drawn from years of dedicated reporting and strong community input, including local press releases and business updates. We deliver top reporting on high-value events such as New York Fashion Week, Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade, and Tribeca Film Festival. Our coverage extends to key organizations like the Greater New York Chamber of Commerce and United Way of New York, plus leading businesses in finance and media that power the local economy such as JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Bloomberg. As part of the broader HERE network, including HEREBuffalo.com, we provide comprehensive, credible insights into New York's dynamic landscape.
