Backlash Against Tish James’ Proposed FAIR Business Practices Act

News Summary

New York Attorney General Tish James is facing significant backlash from business groups regarding her proposed FAIR Business Practices Act, aimed at enhancing consumer protections against deceptive practices. Critics argue it may empower frivolous lawsuits, particularly targeting small businesses, and create an unbalanced legal landscape. Some advocacy groups support the Act, emphasizing the need for stronger consumer protections. The ongoing debate highlights the tension between consumer rights and the operational challenges faced by small businesses in New York.


New York Attorney General Tish James is facing significant backlash from various business groups regarding her proposed FAIR Business Practices Act, which is designed to enhance consumer protections against deceptive business practices.

The FAIR Business Practices Act aims to target issues such as deed theft, junk fees, and hard-to-cancel subscriptions. However, critics argue that the legislation could lead to an increase in frivolous lawsuits, particularly aimed at small businesses. Many warn that this could have negative repercussions for New York’s business community.

Organizations like the Lawsuit Reform Alliance of NY have raised concerns that the act would undermine existing legal safeguards and due process protections. They argue that it would invite potential exploitation by profit-driven lawyers seeking settlements. The proposal includes provisions that would enable law firms to demand pre-suit settlements, which critics believe could create an environment ripe for legal threats against small businesses that may not have the resources to defend themselves in court.

Additionally, the legislation targets activities such as online phishing scams, data breaches, and the predatory practices employed by student loan services and car dealers. Critics of the FAIR Act reference a study indicating that “excess tort costs” are already imposing a burden of $61.8 billion in unnecessary legal expenses on New Yorkers, and they fear that this new act would worsen the existing problem.

Business representatives have called on lawmakers to shift their focus towards supporting small businesses rather than empowering lawyers through potential litigation. Specific concerns have been highlighted regarding the vagueness in definitions contained within the bill, which critics believe could be manipulated by attorneys for profit rather than serving the interest of justice.

The business community is united in requesting that legislators reject the FAIR Business Practices Act, as they believe it undermines efforts to improve affordability and sustainable practices in the state. Proponents of the act, however, argue that it is necessary in light of policy changes made under the Trump administration that they believe have weakened consumer protections. The Attorney General’s office claims that this legislation would close loopholes allowing for consumer scams and better enable officials to protect New Yorkers from corporate malfeasance.

In support of the FAIR Business Practices Act, groups such as the Student Borrower Protection Center and Small Business Majority have emphasized the critical need for stronger protections, particularly as federal consumer oversight faces potential cuts. Advocacy from these groups highlights that the act could provide essential safeguards against predatory lending practices and promote fair treatment for small businesses.

As Attorney General Tish James navigates increasing scrutiny—including a criminal probe related to mortgage fraud allegations—she continues to assert that the FAIR Business Practices Act is integral to her mission of protecting consumers in New York. James has previously won civil fraud charges against Donald Trump and his organization, resulting in significant legal judgments, which adds complexity to her current position.

As debate around the FAIR Business Practices Act intensifies, the future of the proposed legislation remains uncertain amidst a growing chorus of criticism from both the business community and political circles. The ongoing discussions reflect a critical juncture for consumer protection and the operational landscape for small businesses in New York.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

Author: HERE New York

HERE New York

Share
Published by
HERE New York

Recent Posts

Bob Dylan Center Launches Traveling Exhibition in New York

News Summary The Bob Dylan Center unveils its traveling exhibition 'How Many Roads: Bob Dylan…

32 minutes ago

Gen Z’s Demand for Transparency Revamps Corporate Culture

News Summary As Generation Z enters the workforce, they are reshaping corporate expectations, emphasizing transparency…

1 hour ago

New York Implements Enhanced Cybersecurity Legislation

News Summary New York has enacted new cybersecurity legislation to strengthen the protection of municipal…

1 hour ago

New Funding for Syracuse Hancock International Airport Expansion

News Summary New York State has allocated $2.5 million for a new snow control center…

2 hours ago

New York’s Legal Marijuana Market Surges Toward $2 Billion

News Summary New York's legal marijuana market is booming, with sales expected to exceed $2…

2 hours ago

Concerns Rise Over Cybersecurity Cuts Under the Trump Administration

News Summary The Trump administration's substantial cuts to cybersecurity budgets and personnel have caused alarm…

2 hours ago